| Archive for Carp Addict Forum Carp Addict Magazine - For the serious Angler. |
| Big Ron |
Slide film or Digital ????What gives the best shot ???
|
||
| Beaky |
My EOS spits all over my digital mate
|
||
| joe_h |
agreed, although with some slide films the colours seem to saturated and over exagerated.
i much prefer a portrait reversal film myself. |
||
| Mark Mann |
I cant see any point with going along with film!!!
With a decent digi camera 7 meg + you can get perfect pictures up to A4 if you want bigger then you are going to have to look at higher meg say 10+ then an A1 print is on the cards no problems. With digi it's quicker, cheaper (In the long run) and with the right software more than you will ever have with film unless you have a darkroom and all that goes with it!!! and the time to process it!!! Times are changing and film has no place in it as far as i can see!!! Move on before time does it for you!!! |
||
| Big Ron |
Mark ....I have lost count of how many times I have had this conversation with my mate TDP ......He keeps telling me Slide film is the best for quality of picture ( Still )
and when you look at his work ....its very hard to dissagree http://www.wilderness-photo.co.uk/index.php?cat=2 
PS .... I took the ones below 
|
||
| Mark Mann |
Ok Ron the prints do look good but when it comes to design!!! and layout!!!
Here is a band called Slide they are a great band an it looks as though they will be signed in the next 18 months. I photographed and designed there album cover and advertising for them!!! 
|
||
| Big Ron |
I dont dIssagree with you Mark ....but my question was " which give you the best shot "
as for Design and Layout ...surly thats down to the inderviduals ability ....not realy the quality of the picture taken ( yes it helps to have a good quality shot ) but I can scan a slide in and do just the same as I can with a digital shot
Im no expert ( but Im keen to learn ) ....and I also know what my eye tells me, when I look at the end results
Yes it might be a slower process ( agreed )........but which gives the best quality ??? as personaly after traveling very long distances for my trophy shots and senic pictures ....I would rather take the extra time, to achive the better picture my be Im just old fasioned LOL LOL being an old timer 
|
||
| Mark Mann |
Ha ha ha Ron!!!
With some camras boasting 11Mil Plus now i dont think anyone will know the difference at the end of the day it all boils down to the post processing of the picture Wether on photoshop or in a lab!!! Paper quality also plays a big part!! |
||
| joe_h |
its the digital printing that gets to me.
i odnt think im ever guna perfer pixels to grain! |
||
| craftycarper |
Digi's are better quality and I think you do get better shots but digi cameras can sometimes be very sensitive to light which can give film cameras a big advantage | ||